We surveyed 85 HR professionals across 80+ UK organisations - from startups to enterprises with 27,000 employees. We asked about budgets, gift types, what's getting in the way, and whether anyone's actually measuring whether any of this works.
The short version? Most organisations believe gifting helps retention. Almost none can prove it. And while the majority have adopted some kind of platform, most aren't yet using it to its full potential.
Here's what the data says. For the full breakdown by company size, industry, and with actionable frameworks, download the complete UK Gifting & Recognition Benchmarks Report 2026.
Who responded?
We heard from Chief People Officers, Heads of People, VPs of HR, Reward Managers, and People Ops leads at a number of notable organisations.
The sample spans every company size - from micro businesses (1-50 employees, 24% of respondents) through to enterprise organisations with 1,000+ employees (19%). Tech & Software leads the industry breakdown at 32%, followed by Professional Services (24%), Hospitality & F&B (13%), and Healthcare & Pharma (8%).
How much are UK organisations spending on employee gifting?
The most common spend is £50 to £200 per employee per year. Just over half of respondents (52.9%) fall into that band. Another 23.5% spend under £50 per head.
At the other end, just 3.5% spend between £500 and £1,000. Nobody in our survey goes above £1,000.
For context, SHRM's Employee Recognition Survey puts the ideal investment in recognition at around 1-2% of payroll. For a UK employee on £35,000, that's £350 to £700. Most organisations in our survey are spending well below the international benchmark.
Does spending vary by company size?
Yes. But not how you'd expect.
Small companies (51-250 employees) cluster heavily in the £50-£200 range - nearly two-thirds sit there. But at enterprise level, almost a third spend less than £50 per head. The total budget might be bigger, but it gets spread across so many people that the per-person amount often ends up smaller than at a company with 100 employees.
Bigger headcount doesn't mean more generous. It often means more diluted.
The full report breaks this down with detailed cross-tabulations by company size and industry - download it here.
But the more revealing stat is what organisations spend on gifting platforms. 36.5% use a free platform - making it the most common single approach. Only 18.8% are genuinely doing everything by hand with no tools at all.
The majority of organisations have already taken the first step. The barrier to getting started is lower than ever.
At micro companies, manual gifting is still common (45%), but even here a quarter use a free tool. At mid-market and enterprise level, truly manual gifting has essentially disappeared - the split is between free platform users, paid platform users, and those with no programme at all.
Where does the gifting budget actually go?
We asked how budget is split across three areas: calendar events (birthdays, Christmas), milestones (promotions, anniversaries), and behaviour/performance recognition.
- 33.8% spread their budget in a balanced way across multiple areas
- 33.8% put 70%+ into calendar events
- 19.8% focus on behaviour and performance recognition
- 12.7% focus on milestones
Nearly 47% of organisations put the majority of their budget into scheduled, predictable events or milestones. Only 19.8% prioritise recognising in-the-moment behaviour.
This makes sense from an admin perspective. Birthdays don't require manager judgement. But they're also the least personalised, least impactful form of recognition. Gallup's research consistently shows that the recognition that actually moves the needle is frequent, timely, and tied to specific behaviours - not dates on a calendar.
What types of gifts are organisations sending?
Gift vouchers dominate at 43.5%, followed by pre-selected specific gifts (32.9%). Only 20% of organisations give recipients an actual choice of several gifts.
Cash sits at just 5.9%.
Here's where it gets interesting. When we cross-referenced gift type against perceived retention impact, every type of tangible gift scored between 47% and 52% for significant or moderate impact. Cash? Just 20%.
Not close. Not even in the same postcode.
This aligns with Kube et al. (2012, American Economic Review), who found that gift exchange creates stronger motivation in the workplace than cash equivalents. A thoughtful gift feels different from money. And that difference shows up in whether people feel it matters.
Research from Steffel & LeBoeuf (2014, Journal of Consumer Psychology) also found that recipients consistently prefer gifts they can choose themselves - even when the pre-selected option is objectively "better." Choice signals trust and respect. It's why platforms like Huggg's Gift with Choice consistently outperform the "we picked something for you" approach.
The biggest challenges - and how they change as companies grow
Budget constraints are number one overall (58.8%). No surprises there. But the data tells a much more interesting story when you break it down by company size. Three things jump out:
Micro companies care most about finding gifts people actually want (45%). They're small, personal, and gift-shopping manually. The problem isn't motivation. It's curation. Platforms like Huggg solve this by giving small teams access to a curated range across eight categories - from coffee shops and dining to retail and experiences - without needing enterprise software.
Mid-market companies have a manager problem. Inconsistent manager participation spikes to 68% at companies with 251-1,000 employees - nearly seven times higher than micro companies. This is the scale where you can't rely on one person doing all the gifting. You need managers to participate. And they're not.
Enterprise companies feel the pain of geography. Scaling across remote and hybrid locations is their standout challenge (38%). Budget pressure actually eases slightly. The problem isn't money. It's logistics.
The full report includes the complete challenge matrix by company size and a comparison of manual gifters versus platform users - download the report for the detailed breakdown.
The retention paradox
65.9% of HR professionals believe their gifting programme positively impacts retention. 42.4% say that impact is significant or moderate.
And there's a clear dose-response relationship with spending. Organisations spending £200-£500 per employee are 47% more likely to believe gifting impacts retention than those spending under £50. At £500-£1,000, every single respondent believes it works.
But here's the sobering part.
When we asked whether organisations have actually measured retention improvement from their gifting programme:
- 47% track retention but haven't linked it to gifting
- 40.7% don't measure retention impact at all
- 10.2% have measured but seen no clear change
- 2.1% have measured and seen improvement
Two percent. Out of 85 respondents. That's the number who can point to measured, demonstrable retention improvement from their gifting programme.
66% believe it works. 2.1% can prove it.
Most HR teams see it in the reactions. The thank-you messages. The general vibe. But when it comes to building a business case for the CFO? They've got nothing.
This mirrors findings from the CIPD's 2023 Reward Management Survey: while 89% of organisations offer some form of recognition, only 34% evaluate whether it actually works.
The ROI black hole
The measurement gap gets worse when you look at formal ROI tracking:
- 56.4% don't track ROI at all
- 17.7% want to but don't know how
- 16.2% informally track some indicators
- 8.1% say it's not a priority
- 1.6% formally track with clear metrics
Only 1.6% formally track ROI. And here's what the size data adds: even at enterprise level, not a single respondent does it formally.
The "want to but don't know how" group is the most interesting. They're the most enthusiastic believers in gifting's impact (83% believe it works) - but they can't prove it to anyone else. The full report includes a simple measurement framework for this group. Download it here.
What this means for HR teams in 2026
1. Free platform adoption is the real story
Only 18.8% of organisations are genuinely doing gifting by hand. The biggest single group (36.5%) has already adopted a free platform, and at mid-market and enterprise level, no one is truly manual. The barrier to getting started is lower than ever - the real question is whether you're making the most of the tools you already have.
2. Rebalance from calendar to culture
Nearly 40% of budgets go to scheduled events. The research on recognition is clear: frequent, in-the-moment recognition has a bigger impact. Even shifting a chunk of your Christmas budget to spontaneous "thank you" moments could make a real difference.
3. Cash is the least effective thing you can do
20% perceived retention impact versus 47-52% for every other gift type. If cash bonuses are your main recognition tool, the data says they're the least effective approach.
4. Mid-market companies need manager tools
At 251-1,000 employees, 68% cite inconsistent manager participation. At this scale, recognition has to come from managers. And they need tools that make it ridiculously easy - nudges, pre-loaded budgets, one-click sending. Huggg's plans are designed for exactly this.
5. Small companies need curation, not software
45% of micro-companies say their biggest challenge is finding gifts people actually want. They don't need an enterprise platform. They need a curated selection that takes the guesswork out.
Our advice? Start measuring - even informally
Track three things: how many gifts were sent this quarter, retention rates among recipients versus non-recipients, and manager adoption rates.
That puts you ahead of 98.4% of the organisations in this survey.
Download the full report
This blog covers the highlights. The full UK Gifting & Recognition Benchmarks Report 2026 includes detailed cross-tabulations by company size and industry, a comparison of manual gifters versus platform users, budget allocation versus challenge analysis, and a practical measurement framework for proving ROI.
FAQs
How much do UK companies spend on employee gifting?
Our 2026 survey of 85 HR professionals found that 52.9% spend between £50 and £200 per employee per year. 23.5% spend under £50. Bigger companies don't necessarily spend more per head - enterprise organisations are almost as likely to spend under £50 as mid-market companies are to spend over £200.
What's the biggest challenge with employee recognition?
Budget constraints are number one overall (58.8%), but it changes depending on size. At mid-market companies (251-1,000 employees), inconsistent manager participation dominates at 68%. At micro-companies, finding the right gifts is the top concern at 45%.
Do employee gifts help with retention?
65.9% of HR professionals believe gifting positively impacts retention. Mid-market companies report the strongest impact (63% significant or moderate). But only 2.1% have formally measured this improvement - creating a significant gap between belief and evidence.
What type of employee gift is most effective?
Tangible gifts and mixed approaches score 47-52% for significant or moderate retention impact. Cash scores just 20%. Research from the American Economic Review supports this: gift exchange creates stronger workplace motivation than cash equivalents.
Do companies track ROI on gifting?
Only 1.6% formally track ROI on their gifting programme. Even at enterprise level, no respondents track formally. 17.7% want to track ROI but don't know how - this group peaks at mid-market companies and are the most enthusiastic believers in gifting's impact.
How do most companies handle employee gifting?
Only 18.8% genuinely manage gifting manually with no tools. 36.5% use a free platform, and around 28% pay for one. At micro and small companies, manual gifting is more common (30-45%), but even there, free platform adoption is significant. Gift vouchers are the most common gift type (43.5%), followed by pre-selected specific gifts (32.9%).
Send a choice of gifts
Send a specific gift
Recommended articles for you
